The Role of Activity-Based Costing in Online Course Delivery Models

Online learning has transformed how education is delivered worldwide, but here’s a critical question that often gets overlooked: how much does it actually cost to run an online course? While distance education continues its remarkable expansion, surprisingly few studies have tackled the complex economics behind web-based learning delivery. This is where Activity-Based Costing (ABC) steps in as a powerful analytical tool to understand the true financial picture of online education.

The explosive growth of distance education 🔗

Distance learning has undergone dramatic expansion over the past two decades. Since its emergence in 2000, the worldwide market for online learning has grown by more than 900%, making it the fastest-growing segment in the education industry. This growth accelerated dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, with undergraduate students enrolled exclusively online increasing by 367% at public four-year institutions.

The numbers tell a compelling story. In fall 2021, approximately 9.4 million students-representing 61% of all undergraduate students-were enrolled in at least one distance education course. Looking at the global picture, the e-learning market is expected to reach $740.46 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 14.02%.

This expansion has been fueled by technological advances including Learning Management Systems (LMS), video conferencing tools, and increasingly sophisticated content delivery platforms. Today, 98% of universities offer online programs, a significant increase from 77% in 2019.

The cost analysis gap in online education 🔗

Despite this remarkable growth, understanding the actual costs of delivering web-based learning remains challenging. Existing research on costs associated with the design and deployment of eLearning is limited, and the relative costs compared to face-to-face learning are not well understood. The lack of predefined costing models has made it difficult to complete proper cost evaluation.

Many institutions assume that online learning is inherently cheaper than traditional classroom instruction. However, some studies simplify the analysis based on individual elements such as course production or technological infrastructure, offering an incomplete and biased perspective. This oversimplification fails to capture the full complexity of delivering quality virtual education.

Why traditional costing methods fall short 🔗

Traditional approaches to educational costing often overlook critical components. Although some studies identified costs that were not captured, many did not, and these gaps are only evident to researchers who have a background in eLearning delivery. Costs frequently omitted include instructional design time, multimedia production, platform maintenance, and ongoing content updates.

The challenge is compounded by inconsistent methodology for cost analysis across studies, making it difficult to compare findings and draw meaningful conclusions. Different institutions use varying approaches to track expenses, making sector-wide benchmarking nearly impossible.

Understanding Activity-Based Costing 🔗

Activity-Based Costing offers a more sophisticated approach to understanding the true costs of online education. Unlike traditional methods that allocate overhead based on simple metrics, ABC traces costs to specific activities that consume resources. This approach allows institutions to zoom in on the true costs of running educational programs, courses, and administrative tasks by dissecting activities that consume resources.

The fundamental principle is straightforward: cost is understood as the sum of goods and services necessary to produce resources and materials associated with virtual courses, plus the sum required to provide quality virtual training for students. Understanding both revenues and costs of an activity enables decision-makers to make changes and adjustments for the most efficient organizational structure.

Key activities in online course delivery 🔗

When applying ABC to virtual education, costs are typically distributed across six main activities: planning, design, development, teaching, mentoring/follow-up, and service. Each activity involves specific tasks and resource consumption that can be measured and analyzed.

Research into virtual university costs reveals some surprising findings. Instructional design and teaching activities account for 62.5% of the total activities in virtual modalities, highlighting the importance of human resources in technology-mediated education. This contradicts the popular assumption that virtual education primarily requires technological investment rather than human capital.

What the research reveals about online education costs 🔗

Detailed cost analysis using ABC methodology has uncovered important patterns. Teaching is the activity that consumes the largest amount of resources within virtual higher education institutions, followed by the design of training actions. Combined with student follow-up activities and educational services, these functions consume over 80% of allocated resources.

Perhaps counter-intuitively, only 18.6% of resources are used in activities considered essential to virtual modality, such as planning and configuration of virtual classrooms, technology infrastructure, and multimedia course development. This distribution challenges assumptions about where money goes in online education.

The human capital factor 🔗

One of the most significant findings from ABC research relates to labor costs. In virtual learning, professionals with adequate technological skills become increasingly important-those who can develop activities associated with this modality, such as instructional design, multimedia production, and virtual classroom configuration.

This finding contradicts earlier research suggesting that reduced labor costs would be a primary advantage of virtual education. The multiplicity of professional profiles required contradicts conclusions that highlighted labor cost reduction as a key advantage of virtual education. Quality online education requires diverse expertise that comes at a cost.

Implications for educational planning 🔗

The application of ABC to online education has important implications for administrators and policymakers. By fostering transparency and accountability, ABC transforms financial planning and empowers institutions to navigate modern academia’s intricacies while maximizing student success resources.

The accelerated growth of the education sector has resulted in significant changes in institutional management processes, making administrators prepare to face market competitiveness challenges through more effective management systems. ABC provides the detailed information needed for strategic decision-making.

Moving beyond the cost-savings myth 🔗

The assumption that online education automatically saves money deserves scrutiny. Despite a perception that eLearning is more cost-effective than face-to-face instruction, there is not yet sufficient evidence to assert this conclusively. The economics are more nuanced than simple comparisons suggest.

Cost reduction through economies of scale in course production must be considered carefully. Content obsolescence directly influences students’ perception of quality and satisfaction with their program and institution, resulting in demotivation and declining academic performance. Courses require continuous improvement and updating, not just one-time production investments.

The path forward for cost analysis 🔗

As online education continues to grow, the need for rigorous cost analysis becomes more pressing. A rigorous, repeatable data capture method is needed, in addition to a means to leverage existing economic evaluation methods that can test eLearning cost-effectiveness.

Activity-Based Costing offers a promising framework for this analysis. By understanding which activities consume resources and in what proportions, institutions can make informed decisions about investments in online education. Online learning platforms have tapped into ABC to assess expenses associated with crafting and offering digital courses, optimizing their offerings and refining pricing strategies.

The future of cost analysis in online education lies in standardized approaches that allow for meaningful comparisons across institutions and delivery modes. Only with accurate cost information can the higher education sector make sound decisions about how to allocate resources in an increasingly digital landscape.

What do you think? How might better understanding of online education costs change the way institutions approach digital learning investments? Could Activity-Based Costing help your organization make more informed decisions about course delivery methods?

References

1. https://www.devlinpeck.com/content/online-learning-statistics
2. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/09/16/new-data-offer-sense-how-covid-expanded-online-learning
3. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
4. https://research.com/education/online-education-statistics
5. https://entrepreneurshq.com/online-learning-statistics/
6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081275/
7. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/5/506
8. https://moderncampus.com/blog/activity-based-costing-in-higher-education.html
9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ967809.pdf
10. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/4/1/2